On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 at 20:29, Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 20:25:31 +0100
> Anders Roxell <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 at 20:21, Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 14:19:08 -0500
> > > Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > @@ -2435,6 +2438,13 @@ void __weak ftrace_replace_code(int enable)
> > > > >                     /* Stop processing */
> > > > >                     return;
> > > > >             }
> > > > > +           /*
> > > > > +            * Some archs calls this function with interrupts or 
> > > > > preemption
> > > > > +            * disabled. Howeve, other archs don't and this can cause 
> > > > > a
> > >
> > > typo "However". But could you write it this way:
> > >
> > >         "However, for other archs that can preempt, this can cause an
> > >         tremendous unneeded latency."
> > >
> >
> > I'll fix this and move it up (where I added it in the first place but
> > moved it) =)
> >
>
> I also noticed a grammar issue:
>
>         "Some archs call this function .."

I will fix that.

Cheers,
Anders

Reply via email to