Hi, Fabio Best Regards! Anson Huang
> -----Original Message----- > From: Fabio Estevam [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 2018年12月5日 20:15 > To: Anson Huang <[email protected]> > Cc: Shawn Guo <[email protected]>; Sascha Hauer > <[email protected]>; Sascha Hauer <[email protected]>; Fabio > Estevam <[email protected]>; Rob Herring <[email protected]>; > Mark Rutland <[email protected]>; moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX > / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE <[email protected]>; open > list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS > <[email protected]>; linux-kernel <[email protected]>; > dl-linux-imx <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: dts: imx6qdl-sabresd: add light sensor support > > Hi Anson, > > On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 7:20 AM Anson Huang <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Add isl29023 light sensor support on i2c3 bus, the light sensor's > > power is controlled by a fixed regulator, since the isl29023 driver > > and most of other sensors on same board like mag3110 and mma8451 do > > NOT support regulator operation currently, they are all controlled by > > this regulator, so this patch also adds the fixed regulator support > > and make it always on. > > > > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <[email protected]> > > --- > > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-sabresd.dtsi | 34 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-sabresd.dtsi > > b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-sabresd.dtsi > > index d7389b5..f96ae54 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-sabresd.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-sabresd.dtsi > > @@ -62,6 +62,19 @@ > > gpio = <&gpio3 19 0>; > > enable-active-high; > > }; > > + > > + reg_sensor: regulator@4 { > > I know that you followed the existing pattern for regulators in this file, > but it is > not recommended to put regulators under "simple-bus". > > I would suggest you to make a first patch of the series that removes all of > the > existing regulators from "simple-bus", then you add this series on top. > > Then this regulator becomes: > > reg_light_sensor: regulator-light-sensor { > > > + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; > > + reg = <4>; > > + pinctrl-names = "default"; > > + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_sensor_reg>; > > pinctrl_sensor_reg is too generic. You could use pinctrl_light_sensor_reg As this regulator controls all the sensors power on board, including light sensor, magnetometer sensor and accelerometer sensors, so I think it is better to use "pinctrl_sensors_reg" instead of "pinctrl_light_sensor_reg", so I use " pinctrl_sensors_reg" in V2 patch. > > > + regulator-name = "sensor-supply"; > > + regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>; > > + regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>; > > + gpio = <&gpio2 31 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > > + enable-active-high; > > + regulator-always-on; > > + }; > > }; > > > > gpio-keys { > > @@ -420,6 +433,15 @@ > > interrupts = <7 2>; > > wakeup-gpios = <&gpio6 7 0>; > > }; > > + > > + isl29023@44 { > > Node names should be generic, so: light-sensor@44 Improved it in V2 patch, and also apply the patch you sent me as the first patch, please help review them, thanks. Anson.
