On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 10:48:45AM -0700, Mathieu Poirier wrote: [...]
> > So I think there still have some difference between TRACE_ON and > > NO_SYNC packets, TRACE_ON packet indicates the start of trace and it's > > also possible caused by tracing discontinuity; NO_SYNC packets usually > > caused by an unsynchronised state. But both of them presents > > discontinuity in perf trace data. > > > > I prefer to use two different packet types to present them, this can > > let the code to be more readable and easier to be maintained later. > > Absolutely. Make sure to get to the bottom of the story with Mike > and/or Robert before sending your next patchset. Sure, will sync with Mike/Rob. Thanks, Leo Yan
