With cache=never, we fall back to direct IO. pjdfstest chmod test 12.t was
failing because if a file has setuid bit, it should be cleared if an
unpriviledged user opens it for write and writes to it.

Call fuse_remove_privs() even for direct I/O path.

Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgo...@redhat.com>
---
 fs/fuse/file.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c
index cb28cf26a6e7..0be5a7380b3c 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/file.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/file.c
@@ -1679,13 +1679,25 @@ static ssize_t fuse_direct_write_iter(struct kiocb 
*iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
        /* Don't allow parallel writes to the same file */
        inode_lock(inode);
        res = generic_write_checks(iocb, from);
-       if (res > 0)
-               res = fuse_direct_io(&io, from, &iocb->ki_pos, FUSE_DIO_WRITE);
+       if (res < 0)
+               goto out_invalidate;
+
+       res = file_remove_privs(iocb->ki_filp);
+       if (res)
+               goto out_invalidate;
+
+       res = fuse_direct_io(&io, from, &iocb->ki_pos, FUSE_DIO_WRITE);
+       if (res < 0)
+               goto out_invalidate;
+
        fuse_invalidate_attr(inode);
-       if (res > 0)
-               fuse_write_update_size(inode, iocb->ki_pos);
+       fuse_write_update_size(inode, iocb->ki_pos);
        inode_unlock(inode);
+       return res;
 
+out_invalidate:
+       fuse_invalidate_attr(inode);
+       inode_unlock(inode);
        return res;
 }
 
-- 
2.13.6

Reply via email to