From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com>

fput() will be moved out of this function in a later patch, so we cannot
rely on it as the memory barrier for ensuring file->private_data = fud
is visible.

Luckily there is a mutex_unlock() right before fput() which provides the
same effect.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com>
---
 fs/fuse/inode.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fuse/inode.c b/fs/fuse/inode.c
index 0b94b23b02d4..d08cd8bf7705 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/inode.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/inode.c
@@ -1198,12 +1198,11 @@ static int fuse_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void 
*data, int silent)
        list_add_tail(&fc->entry, &fuse_conn_list);
        sb->s_root = root_dentry;
        file->private_data = fud;
-       mutex_unlock(&fuse_mutex);
        /*
-        * atomic_dec_and_test() in fput() provides the necessary
-        * memory barrier for file->private_data to be visible on all
-        * CPUs after this
+        * mutex_unlock() provides the necessary memory barrier for
+        * file->private_data to be visible on all CPUs after this
         */
+       mutex_unlock(&fuse_mutex);
        fput(file);
 
        fuse_send_init(fc, init_req);
-- 
2.13.6

Reply via email to