Vitaly Bordug wrote:

This is now very similar to pata_platform.c, they both use
same platform data structure and same resources.

To achieve that, byte_lanes_swapping platform data variable
and platform specified iops removed from that driver. It's fine,
since those were never used anyway.

   Hopefully, PPC will never need them.

pata_platform and ide_platform are carrying same driver names,
to easily switch between these drivers, without need to touch
platform code.

diff --git a/drivers/ide/legacy/ide_platform.c 
b/drivers/ide/legacy/ide_platform.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0b3f5b5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/ide/legacy/ide_platform.c
@@ -0,0 +1,181 @@
+/*
+ * Platform IDE driver
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2007 MontaVista Software
+ *
+ * Maintainer: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Poor Kumar, I guess he was surprised be being assigned a maintainer of the driver he didn't write (well, even if it borrowed some code from his earlier one ;-)...

+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute  it and/or modify it
+ * under  the terms of  the GNU General  Public License as published by the
+ * Free Software Foundation;  either version 2 of the  License, or (at your
+ * option) any later version.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/ide.h>
+#include <linux/ioport.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/pata_platform.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
+
+static struct {
+       void __iomem *plat_ide_mapbase;
+       void __iomem *plat_ide_alt_mapbase;
+       ide_hwif_t *hwif;
+       int index;
+} hwif_prop;
+
+static ide_hwif_t *__devinit plat_ide_locate_hwif(void __iomem *base,
+           void __iomem *ctrl, struct pata_platform_info *pdata, int irq,
+           int mmio)
+{
+       unsigned long port = (unsigned long)base;
+       ide_hwif_t *hwif;
+       int index, i;
+
+       for (index = 0; index < MAX_HWIFS; ++index) {
+               hwif = ide_hwifs + index;
+               if (hwif->io_ports[IDE_DATA_OFFSET] == port)
+                       goto found;
+       }
+
+       for (index = 0; index < MAX_HWIFS; ++index) {
+               hwif = ide_hwifs + index;
+               if (hwif->io_ports[IDE_DATA_OFFSET] == 0)
+                       goto found;
+       }
+
+       return NULL;
+
+found:
+
+       hwif->hw.io_ports[IDE_DATA_OFFSET] = port;
+
+       port += (1 << pdata->ioport_shift);
+       for (i = IDE_ERROR_OFFSET; i <= IDE_STATUS_OFFSET;
+            i++, port += (1 << pdata->ioport_shift))

   Looks like shift doesn't buy as anything, why not just use stride?

+               hwif->hw.io_ports[i] = port;
+
+       hwif->hw.io_ports[IDE_CONTROL_OFFSET] = (unsigned long)ctrl;
+
+       memcpy(hwif->io_ports, hwif->hw.io_ports, sizeof(hwif->hw.io_ports));
+       hwif->hw.irq = hwif->irq = irq;
+
+       hwif->hw.dma = NO_DMA;
+       hwif->hw.chipset = ide_generic;
+
+       if (mmio) {
+               hwif->mmio = 1;
+               default_hwif_mmiops(hwif);
+       }

   And why default_hwif_iops(hwif) is not called else?
And I remember the previos variant was overriding INSW()/OUTSW() methods -- turned out to be unnecessary? :-)

+
+       hwif_prop.hwif = hwif;
+       hwif_prop.index = index;
+
+       return hwif;
+}
+
+static int __devinit plat_ide_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+       struct resource *res_base, *res_alt, *res_irq;
+       ide_hwif_t *hwif;
+       struct pata_platform_info *pdata;
+       int ret = 0;
+       int mmio = 0;
+
+       pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
+
+       /* get a pointer to the register memory */
+       res_base = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IO, 0);
+       res_alt = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IO, 1);
+
+       if (!res_base || !res_alt) {
+               res_base = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
+               res_alt = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 1);
+               if (!res_base || !res_alt) {
+                       ret = -ENOMEM;

   ENODEV or EINVAL you mean? :-)

+                       goto out;

   Bleh... just return please.

+               }
+               mmio = 1;
+       }
+
+       res_irq = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 0);
+       if (!res_irq) {
+               ret = -EINVAL;
+               goto out;

   Bleh... return -EINVAL, please. Or maybe -ENODEV.

+       }
+
[...]
+       hwif = plat_ide_locate_hwif(hwif_prop.plat_ide_mapbase,
+                hwif_prop.plat_ide_alt_mapbase, pdata, res_irq->start, mmio);
+
+       if (!hwif) {
+               ret = -ENODEV;
+               goto out;

   Bleh... please just

return -ENODEV.

+       }
+       hwif->gendev.parent = &pdev->dev;
+       hwif->noprobe = 0;
+
+       probe_hwif_init(hwif);
+
+       platform_set_drvdata(pdev, hwif);
+       ide_proc_register_port(hwif);
+
+       return 0;
+
+out:

No need to abuse the function cleanup style when you have nothing to cleanup. :-/

+       return ret;
+}
+
+static int __devexit plat_ide_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+       ide_hwif_t *hwif = pdev->dev.driver_data;
+
+       if (hwif != hwif_prop.hwif) {
+               dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, &pdev->dev, "%s: hwif value error",
+                          pdev->name);
+       } else {
+               ide_unregister(hwif_prop.index);
+               hwif_prop.index = 0;
+               hwif_prop.hwif = NULL;
+       }
+

   I'd have interchanged the success/failure branches...

+       return 0;
+}
+
+static struct platform_driver platform_ide_driver = {
+       .driver {
+               .name = "pata_platform",
+       },
+       .probe = plat_ide_probe,
+       .remove = __devexit_p(plat_ide_remove),
+};
+
+static int __init platform_ide_init(void)
+{
+       return platform_driver_register(&platform_ide_driver);
+}
+
+static void __exit platform_ide_exit(void)
+{
+       platform_driver_unregister(&platform_ide_driver);
+}
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Platform IDE driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
+
+module_init(platform_ide_init);
+module_exit(platform_ide_exit);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to