Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
This is now very similar to pata_platform.c, they both use same platform data structure and same resources.
To achieve that, byte_lanes_swapping platform data variable and platform specified iops removed from that driver. It's fine, since those were never used anyway.
pata_platform and ide_platform are carrying same driver names, to easily switch between these drivers, without need to touch platform code.
Why? There's a drivers/ide/arm/ide_arm.c IDe driver that some platforms (not in the mainline) hack to access, e.g., CF cards in true-IDE mode. About a month ago I submitted a patch to arm-linux-kernel switching that
Wrong list to submit sych stuff, post to linux-ide.
driver to using platform-device. I got a reply, that it's not worth it now that IDE is slowly becoming obsolete, and the pata_platform serves the perpose perfectly well. I found this argument reasonable, I had the same
Ignore such replies in the future. ;-)
doubt, just wanted to double-check. So, why do we now need a new legacy (a/drivers/ide/legacy/ide_platform.c) driver when a "modern" driver exists?
Good question (I know the answer but won't tell ;-).
Thanks Guennadi
MBR, Sergei - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
