From: David Miller <da...@davemloft.net>

[ Upstream commit c01ac66b38660f2b507ccd0b75d28e3002d56fbb ]

The message got changed a lot time ago.

This was responsible for 36 test case failures on sparc64.

Fixes: f1174f77b50c ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking")
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <a...@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 67c412d19c09..d80c36465c1c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -12746,7 +12746,7 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool 
unpriv,
 
        reject_from_alignment = fd_prog < 0 &&
                                (test->flags & 
F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) &&
-                               strstr(bpf_vlog, "Unknown alignment.");
+                               strstr(bpf_vlog, "misaligned");
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
        if (reject_from_alignment) {
                printf("FAIL\nFailed due to alignment despite having efficient 
unaligned access: '%s'!\n",
-- 
2.19.1

Reply via email to