* Roger Quadros <[email protected]> [181214 09:42]: > Kishon, > > On 05/12/18 17:03, Roger Quadros wrote: > > If clk_get() returns -EPROBE_DEFER then we should just > > return instead of falling back to old clock name. > > > > Use clk_prepare_enable() and clk_disable_unprepare() instead > > of splitting up prepare/unprepare from enable/disable. > > > > Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <[email protected]> > > I think you should pick this one for -next independently of the rest > of the series as Tony's ti-sysc patches might cause this issue to trigger > due to re-ordering of devices.
Yes good idea. FYI, the reason why we can start seeing deferred probe happen for some new devices with the ti-sysc changes is because we group the devices by the l4 interconnect and probe the interconnect instances separately. Regards, TOny
