Andrew, will you fold below diff into "mm, oom: add oom victim's memcg to the
oom context information" ?
>From add1e8daddbfc5186417dbc58e9e11e7614868f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-ker...@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 16:09:31 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] mm, oom: Use pr_cont() in mem_cgroup_print_oom_context().
One line summary of the OOM killer context is not one line due to
not using KERN_CONT.
[ 23.346650]
oom-kill:constraint=CONSTRAINT_NONE,nodemask=(null),cpuset=/,mems_allowed=0
[ 23.346691] ,global_oom,task_memcg=/,task=firewalld,pid=5096,uid=0
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-ker...@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index b860dd4f7..4afd597 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1306,10 +1306,10 @@ void mem_cgroup_print_oom_context(struct mem_cgroup
*memcg, struct task_struct *
rcu_read_lock();
if (memcg) {
- pr_info(",oom_memcg=");
+ pr_cont(",oom_memcg=");
pr_cont_cgroup_path(memcg->css.cgroup);
} else
- pr_info(",global_oom");
+ pr_cont(",global_oom");
if (p) {
pr_cont(",task_memcg=");
pr_cont_cgroup_path(task_cgroup(p, memory_cgrp_id));
--
1.8.3.1
