On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 at 13:11, Daniel Lezcano <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 29/11/2018 18:46, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > From: Lina Iyer <[email protected]>
> >
> > Currently CPU's idle states are represented in a flattened model, via the
> > "cpu-idle-states" binding from within the CPU's device nodes.
> >
> > Support the hierarchical layout, simply by converting to calling the new OF
> > helper, of_get_cpu_state_node().
> >
> > Cc: Lina Iyer <[email protected]>
> > Suggested-by: Sudeep Holla <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <[email protected]>
> > Co-developed-by: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>
> > ---
>
> Fold it with 07/27 ?
I can do that. However, normally we try to keep changes that touches
different subsystems, separate from each other. Of course sometimes
it's not possible and sometimes it just doesn't make sense to separate
changes.
Perhaps the PSCI maintainers and Rafael can give their opinion.
Kind regards
Uffe
>
> >
> > Changes in v10:
> > - None.
> >
> > ---
> > drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c b/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
> > index cbfc936d251c..631e20720a22 100644
> > --- a/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
> > @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ static int psci_dt_cpu_init_idle(struct cpuidle_driver
> > *drv,
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < num_state_nodes; i++) {
> > - state_node = of_parse_phandle(cpu_node, "cpu-idle-states", i);
> > + state_node = of_get_cpu_state_node(cpu_node, i);
> > if (!state_node)
> > break;
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
>
> Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
> <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
> <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
>
