The policy flags could be targeted by an attacker aiming at disabling IMA,
so that there would be no trace of a file system modification in the
measurement list.

Since the flags can be altered at runtime, it is not possible to make
them become fully read-only, for example with __ro_after_init.

__wr_after_init can still provide some protection, at least against
simple memory overwrite attacks

Signed-off-by: Igor Stoppa <igor.sto...@huawei.com>

CC: Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net>
CC: Nadav Amit <nadav.a...@gmail.com>
CC: Matthew Wilcox <wi...@infradead.org>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
CC: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org>
CC: Dave Hansen <dave.han...@linux.intel.com>
CC: Mimi Zohar <zo...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: linux-integr...@vger.kernel.org
CC: kernel-harden...@lists.openwall.com
CC: linux...@kvack.org
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
 security/integrity/ima/ima.h        | 3 ++-
 security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c   | 5 +++--
 security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 9 +++++----
 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
index cc12f3449a72..297c25f5122e 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
 #include <linux/hash.h>
 #include <linux/tpm.h>
 #include <linux/audit.h>
+#include <linux/prmem.h>
 #include <crypto/hash_info.h>
 
 #include "../integrity.h"
@@ -50,7 +51,7 @@ enum tpm_pcrs { TPM_PCR0 = 0, TPM_PCR8 = 8 };
 #define IMA_TEMPLATE_IMA_FMT "d|n"
 
 /* current content of the policy */
-extern int ima_policy_flag;
+extern int ima_policy_flag __wr_after_init;
 
 /* set during initialization */
 extern int ima_hash_algo;
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c 
b/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c
index 59d834219cd6..5f4e13e671bf 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
 #include <linux/scatterlist.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/prmem.h>
 
 #include "ima.h"
 
@@ -98,9 +99,9 @@ void __init ima_load_x509(void)
 {
        int unset_flags = ima_policy_flag & IMA_APPRAISE;
 
-       ima_policy_flag &= ~unset_flags;
+       wr_assign(ima_policy_flag, ima_policy_flag & ~unset_flags);
        integrity_load_x509(INTEGRITY_KEYRING_IMA, CONFIG_IMA_X509_PATH);
-       ima_policy_flag |= unset_flags;
+       wr_assign(ima_policy_flag, ima_policy_flag | unset_flags);
 }
 #endif
 
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c 
b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index 7489cb7de6dc..2004de818d92 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
 #define INVALID_PCR(a) (((a) < 0) || \
        (a) >= (FIELD_SIZEOF(struct integrity_iint_cache, measured_pcrs) * 8))
 
-int ima_policy_flag;
+int ima_policy_flag __wr_after_init;
 static int temp_ima_appraise;
 static int build_ima_appraise __ro_after_init;
 
@@ -452,12 +452,13 @@ void ima_update_policy_flag(void)
 
        list_for_each_entry(entry, ima_rules, list) {
                if (entry->action & IMA_DO_MASK)
-                       ima_policy_flag |= entry->action;
+                       wr_assign(ima_policy_flag,
+                                 ima_policy_flag | entry->action);
        }
 
        ima_appraise |= (build_ima_appraise | temp_ima_appraise);
        if (!ima_appraise)
-               ima_policy_flag &= ~IMA_APPRAISE;
+               wr_assign(ima_policy_flag, ima_policy_flag & ~IMA_APPRAISE);
 }
 
 static int ima_appraise_flag(enum ima_hooks func)
@@ -574,7 +575,7 @@ void ima_update_policy(void)
        list_splice_tail_init_rcu(&ima_temp_rules, policy, synchronize_rcu);
 
        if (ima_rules != policy) {
-               ima_policy_flag = 0;
+               wr_assign(ima_policy_flag, 0);
                ima_rules = policy;
        }
        ima_update_policy_flag();
-- 
2.19.1

Reply via email to