Hi,
Friendly ping:
Who can ack or review this patch, please?
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 11/27/18 10:33 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that, in this particular case, I replaced "allow fall-through"
with a "fall through" annotation, which is what GCC is expecting to
find.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gust...@embeddedor.com>
---
drivers/scsi/qla4xxx/ql4_os.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla4xxx/ql4_os.c b/drivers/scsi/qla4xxx/ql4_os.c
index 1c702cd22359..7fd3491ea2d9 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/qla4xxx/ql4_os.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/qla4xxx/ql4_os.c
@@ -2876,7 +2876,7 @@ static int qla4xxx_session_get_param(struct
iscsi_cls_session *cls_sess,
chap_tbl.secret_len);
}
}
- /* allow fall-through */
+ /* fall through */
default:
return iscsi_session_get_param(cls_sess, param, buf);
}
