When comparing a pointer, it's clearer to compare it to NULL than to 0.
Here is an excerpt of the semantic patch:
@@
expression *E;
@@
E ==
- 0
+ NULL
@@
expression *E;
@@
E !=
- 0
+ NULL
Signed-off-by: Yoann Padioleau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
smp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c
index 04c7e1d..16fccbe 100644
--- a/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c
@@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ smp_call_function (void (*func) (void *i
if (retry) {
spin_lock (&lock);
- while (smp_call_function_data != 0)
+ while (smp_call_function_data != NULL)
barrier();
}
else {
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
