The [ip,ip6,arp]_tables use x_tables_info internally and the underlying
memory is already accounted to kmemcg. Do the same for ebtables. The
syzbot, by using setsockopt(EBT_SO_SET_ENTRIES), was able to OOM the
whole system from a restricted memcg, a potential DoS.

By accounting the ebt_table_info, the memory used for ebt_table_info can
be contained within the memcg of the allocating process. However the
lifetime of ebt_table_info is independent of the allocating process and
is tied to the network namespace. So, the oom-killer will not be able to
relieve the memory pressure due to ebt_table_info memory. The memory for
ebt_table_info is allocated through vmalloc. Currently vmalloc does not
handle the oom-killed allocating process correctly and one large
allocation can bypass memcg limit enforcement. So, with this patch,
at least the small allocations will be contained. For large allocations,
we need to fix vmalloc.

Reported-by: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <[email protected]>
Cc: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <[email protected]>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <[email protected]>
Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik <[email protected]>
Cc: Roopa Prabhu <[email protected]>
Cc: Nikolay Aleksandrov <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Linux MM <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: LKML <[email protected]>
---
Changelog since v1:
- More descriptive commit message.

 net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c
index 491828713e0b..5e55cef0cec3 100644
--- a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c
+++ b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c
@@ -1137,14 +1137,16 @@ static int do_replace(struct net *net, const void 
__user *user,
        tmp.name[sizeof(tmp.name) - 1] = 0;
 
        countersize = COUNTER_OFFSET(tmp.nentries) * nr_cpu_ids;
-       newinfo = vmalloc(sizeof(*newinfo) + countersize);
+       newinfo = __vmalloc(sizeof(*newinfo) + countersize, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT,
+                           PAGE_KERNEL);
        if (!newinfo)
                return -ENOMEM;
 
        if (countersize)
                memset(newinfo->counters, 0, countersize);
 
-       newinfo->entries = vmalloc(tmp.entries_size);
+       newinfo->entries = __vmalloc(tmp.entries_size, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT,
+                                    PAGE_KERNEL);
        if (!newinfo->entries) {
                ret = -ENOMEM;
                goto free_newinfo;
-- 
2.20.1.415.g653613c723-goog

Reply via email to