On 2019-01-08 23:43, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Tue 08-01-19 09:56:09, Alexander Duyck wrote:
On Fri, 2019-01-04 at 10:31 +0530, Arun KS wrote:
[...]
> static int online_pages_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long
nr_pages,
> void *arg)
> {
> - unsigned long i;
> unsigned long onlined_pages = *(unsigned long *)arg;
> - struct page *page;
>
> if (PageReserved(pfn_to_page(start_pfn)))
> - for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
> - page = pfn_to_page(start_pfn + i);
> - (*online_page_callback)(page);
> - onlined_pages++;
> - }
> + onlined_pages = online_pages_blocks(start_pfn, nr_pages);
Shouldn't this be a "+=" instead of an "="? It seems like you are
going
to lose your count otherwise.
You are right of course. I should have noticed during the review.
Thanks!
I think we don't need to. The caller function is setting onlined_pages =
0 before calling online_pages_range().
And there are no other reference to online_pages_range other than from
online_pages().
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/mm/memory_hotplug.c?h=v5.0-rc1#n845
int __ref online_pages(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages, int
online_type)
{
unsigned long flags;
unsigned long onlined_pages = 0;
Regards,
Arun
