On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 12:18:53AM +0100, Andrea Parri wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 01:07:06PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > This series contains updates for the Linux-kernel memory model:
> >
> > 1-3. Add SRCU support, courtesy of Alan Stern.
> >
> > 4. Update README for adding of SRCU support.
> >
> > 5. Update memory-barriers.txt on enforcing heavy ordering for
> > port-I/O accesses, courtesy of Will Deacon. This one needs
> > an ack, preferably by someone from Intel. Matthew Wilcox
> > posted some feedback from an Intel manual here, which might
> > be considered to be a close substitute, but... ;-)
> >
> > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181127192234.gf10...@bombadil.infradead.org
> >
> > 6. Update Documentation/explanation.txt to include SRCU support,
> > courtesy of Alan Stern.
> >
> > 7. Dynamically check SRCU lock-to-unlock matching, courtesy of
> > Luc Maranget. This needs an ack.
>
> It seems that
>
> 1b52d0186177 ("tools/memory-model: Model smp_mb__after_unlock_lock()")
>
> from linux-rcu/dev got lost; this also needs an ack (probably yours! ;D,
> considered that, IIRC, you introduced the primitive and RCU is currently
> its only user.)
That commit is in -tip:
4607abbcf464 ("tools/memory-model: Model smp_mb__after_unlock_lock()")
So it has already left my -rcu tree. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
