Hi Doug,
On 1/10/19 01:18, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 9:02 AM Georgi Djakov <georgi.dja...@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> From: David Dai <daidav...@codeaurora.org>
>>
>> Add RSC (Resource State Coordinator) provider
>> dictating network-on-chip interconnect bus performance
>> found on SDM845-based platforms.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Dai <daidav...@codeaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Georgi Djakov <georgi.dja...@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 5 +++++
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>> index b72bdb0a31a5..b3cd256a154e 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>> @@ -1324,6 +1324,11 @@
>> compatible = "qcom,sdm845-rpmh-clk";
>> #clock-cells = <1>;
>> };
>> +
>> + rsc_hlos: interconnect {
>> + compatible = "qcom,sdm845-rsc-hlos";
>> + #interconnect-cells = <1>;
>> + };
>
> It would have been convenient if this patch had also added an include above:
>
> #include <dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,sdm845.h>
>
> ...while the include isn't technically needed by this patch, all the
> patches that want to actually _use_ the interconnect will need to add
> the #include and then you get to some fun fights about who has to add
> the include in which patch. For instance these two patches won't
> compile:
>
> *
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1545373748-1416-1-git-send-email-jshek...@codeaurora.org
> * https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181220173026.3857-4-jcro...@codeaurora.org
>
> ...because neither of them happened to add the include. Maybe they
> were both assuming someone else would do it?
>
>
> If nobody else wants to, I'm happy to post a patch to add that include
> myself and it can be applied atop this one. ...or if this patch needs
> to spin for some other reason maybe you could add it into this patch
> directly?
Ok, i will add it and resend.
Thanks,
Georgi
