On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 09:23:53AM +0800, Chao Fan wrote:
> Yes, 'table64' looks superfluous here, but after these lines, there is:
>                         if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_64) && table64 >> 32) {
> so the 'table64' is useful here for i386. 'table' is unsigned long, it
> can't do the right shift. But the 'table64' who is u64 can do that right
> shift.

Have you actually tried fixing what I suggested or you're just talking?

---
diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/acpi.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/acpi.c
index e9dd84f459ed..0537d46fb21f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/acpi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/acpi.c
@@ -77,21 +77,19 @@ static acpi_physical_address efi_get_rsdp_addr(void)
                        sizeof(efi_config_table_32_t);
 
        for (i = 0; i < systab->nr_tables; i++) {
+               acpi_physical_address table;
                void *config_tables;
-               unsigned long table;
                efi_guid_t guid;
 
                config_tables = (void *)(systab->tables + size * i);
                if (efi_64) {
                        efi_config_table_64_t *tmp_table;
-                       u64 table64;
 
                        tmp_table = config_tables;
                        guid = tmp_table->guid;
-                       table64 = tmp_table->table;
-                       table = table64;
+                       table = tmp_table->table;
 
-                       if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_64) && table64 >> 32) {
+                       if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_64) && table >> 32) {
                                debug_putstr("Error getting RSDP address: EFI 
config table located above 4GB.\n");
                                return 0;
                        }

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

Reply via email to