On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 10:51:14AM +0530, Sheetal Tigadoli wrote: > From: Praveen Kumar B <pravee...@broadcom.com> > > Add new compatible string for new version of pwm-kona > > Signed-off-by: Praveen Kumar B <pravee...@broadcom.com> > Reviewed-by: Ray Jui <ray....@broadcom.com> > Reviewed-by: Scott Branden <scott.bran...@broadcom.com> > Signed-off-by: Sheetal Tigadoli <sheetal.tigad...@broadcom.com> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/brcm,kona-pwm.txt | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/brcm,kona-pwm.txt > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/brcm,kona-pwm.txt > index 8eae9fe..d37f697 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/brcm,kona-pwm.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/brcm,kona-pwm.txt > @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Broadcom Kona PWM controller device tree bindings > This controller has 6 channels. > > Required Properties : > -- compatible: should contain "brcm,kona-pwm" > +- compatible: should contain "brcm,kona-pwm" or "brcm,kona-pwm-v2"
Is v2 used on a newer generation of kona SoCs? On i.MX these variants are usually named after the first SoC that came with the new variant. Is this sensible here, too? Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
