Similar problem here as well.. $subject probably needs to be explicit
about eMMC?
On 13:03-20190110, Faiz Abbas wrote:
> On the am654x-evm, the sdhci0 node is connected to an eMMC. Add node and
> pinmux for the same.
>
> Signed-off-by: Faiz Abbas <faiz_ab...@ti.com>
> ---
> .../arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am654-base-board.dts | 25 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am654-base-board.dts
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am654-base-board.dts
> index e41fc3a5987b..11e9a2a43dfc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am654-base-board.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am654-base-board.dts
> @@ -69,6 +69,23 @@
> AM65X_IOPAD(0x01bc, PIN_OUTPUT, 0) /* (AG13) SPI0_CS0 */
> >;
> };
> +
> + main_mmc0_pins_default: main-mmc0-pins-default {
> + pinctrl-single,pins = <
> + AM65X_IOPAD(0x01a8, PIN_INPUT_PULLDOWN, 0) /* (B25)
> MMC0_CLK */
> + AM65X_IOPAD(0x01ac, PIN_INPUT_PULLUP, 0) /* (B27)
> MMC0_CMD */
> + AM65X_IOPAD(0x01a4, PIN_INPUT_PULLUP, 0) /* (A26)
> MMC0_DAT0 */
> + AM65X_IOPAD(0x01a0, PIN_INPUT_PULLUP, 0) /* (E25)
> MMC0_DAT1 */
> + AM65X_IOPAD(0x019c, PIN_INPUT_PULLUP, 0) /* (C26)
> MMC0_DAT2 */
> + AM65X_IOPAD(0x0198, PIN_INPUT_PULLUP, 0) /* (A25)
> MMC0_DAT3 */
> + AM65X_IOPAD(0x0194, PIN_INPUT_PULLUP, 0) /* (E24)
> MMC0_DAT4 */
> + AM65X_IOPAD(0x0190, PIN_INPUT_PULLUP, 0) /* (A24)
> MMC0_DAT5 */
> + AM65X_IOPAD(0x018c, PIN_INPUT_PULLUP, 0) /* (B26)
> MMC0_DAT6 */
> + AM65X_IOPAD(0x0188, PIN_INPUT_PULLUP, 0) /* (D25)
> MMC0_DAT7 */
> + AM65X_IOPAD(0x01b4, PIN_INPUT_PULLUP, 0) /* (A23)
> MMC0_SDCD */
> + AM65X_IOPAD(0x01b0, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* (C25) MMC0_DS */
> + >;
> + };
> };
>
> &main_pmx1 {
> @@ -163,3 +180,11 @@
> #size-cells= <1>;
> };
> };
> +
> +&sdhci0 {
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&main_mmc0_pins_default>;
> + bus-width = <8>;
> + non-removable;
> + ti,driver-strength-ohm = <50>;
> +};
> --
> 2.19.2
>
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
