On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 03:02:18AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 06:04:13PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 02:09:18PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > > > On Fri, 2019-01-18 at 16:25 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > I get this on a Geminilake NUC after rebasing my maintainer trees: > > > > > > > > tpm tpm0: A TPM error (-1) occurred attempting the self test > > > > > > > > I checked the latest commit ID from drivers/char/tpm to make sure > > > > that I did not put anything broken to my last PR [1]. It works > > > > without issues. > > > > > > > > In addition [2] gives me an empty diff. > > > > > > > > Something outside of the TPM driver must have happened that breaks > > > > the driver. Any ideas? > > > > > > > > [1] commit 9488585b21bef0df1217e510c7134905d1d376a7 > > > > [2] git diff 9488585b21bef0df1217e510c7134905d1d376a7 master > > > > drivers/char/tpm/ > > > > > > I'm afraid you're going to have to bisect to find the offending in- > > > kernel commit, which is going to be painful since it seems to depend on > > > physical hardware. My first instinct is that we're getting a zero > > > length read somewhere, but I still can't see anything in the merge > > > window that would cause that behaviour. > > > > Yeah, I've started to bisect it (still 9 rounds to go). > > Fails on commit 170d13ca3a2fdaaa0283399247631b76b441cca2. Still works on > preceding commit a959dc88f9c8900296ccf13e2f3e1cbc555a8917.
This changes the IO access pattern in memcpy_to/fromio.. Presumably CRB HW doesn't like the new 4 byte move? Swap each one in crb to memcpy to confirm.. If the HW requires particular access patterns you can't use memcpy_to/fromio Jason