Re: [PATCH] lightnvm: pblk: stop taking the free lock in in pblk_lines_free

[Javier González]

> On 22 Jan 2019, at 11.15, h...@owltronix.com wrote:
> 
> From: Hans Holmberg <hans.holmb...@cnexlabs.com>
> 
> pblk_line_meta_free might sleep (it can end up calling vfree, depending
> on how we allocate lba lists), and this can lead to a BUG()
> if we wake up on a different cpu and release the lock.
> 
> As there is no point of grabbing the free lock when pblk has shut down,
> remove the lock.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hans Holmberg <hans.holmb...@cnexlabs.com>
> ---
> drivers/lightnvm/pblk-init.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-init.c b/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-init.c
> index f9a3e47b6a93..eb0135c77805 100644
> --- a/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-init.c
> +++ b/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-init.c
> @@ -584,14 +584,12 @@ static void pblk_lines_free(struct pblk *pblk)
>       struct pblk_line *line;
>       int i;
> 
> -     spin_lock(&l_mg->free_lock);
>       for (i = 0; i < l_mg->nr_lines; i++) {
>               line = &pblk->lines[i];
> 
>               pblk_line_free(line);
>               pblk_line_meta_free(l_mg, line);
>       }
> -     spin_unlock(&l_mg->free_lock);
> 
>       pblk_line_mg_free(pblk);
> 
> --
> 2.17.1

Can you add a comment too indicating that this is only safe on a single
threaded shutdown?

Otherwise the patch looks good.

Reviewed-by: Javier González <jav...@javigon.com>

signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP