On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 14:35:01 -0500 Johannes Weiner <han...@cmpxchg.org> wrote:

> psi has provisions to shut off the periodic aggregation worker when
> there is a period of no task activity - and thus no data that needs
> aggregating. However, while developing psi monitoring, Suren noticed
> that the aggregation clock currently won't stay shut off for good.
> 
> Debugging this revealed a flaw in the idle design: an aggregation run
> will see no task activity and decide to go to sleep; shortly
> thereafter, the kworker thread that executed the aggregation will go
> idle and cause a scheduling change, during which the psi callback will
> kick the !pending worker again. This will ping-pong forever, and is
> equivalent to having no shut-off logic at all (but with more code!)
> 
> Fix this by exempting aggregation workers from psi's clock waking
> logic when the state change is them going to sleep. To do this, tag
> workers with the last work function they executed, and if in psi we
> see a worker going to sleep after aggregating psi data, we will not
> reschedule the aggregation work item.
> 
> What if the worker is also executing other items before or after?
> 
> Any psi state times that were incurred by work items preceding the
> aggregation work will have been collected from the per-cpu buckets
> during the aggregation itself. If there are work items following the
> aggregation work, the worker's last_func tag will be overwritten and
> the aggregator will be kept alive to process this genuine new activity.
> 
> If the aggregation work is the last thing the worker does, and we
> decide to go idle, the brief period of non-idle time incurred between
> the aggregation run and the kworker's dequeue will be stranded in the
> per-cpu buckets until the clock is woken by later activity. But that
> should not be a problem. The buckets can hold 4s worth of time, and
> future activity will wake the clock with a 2s delay, giving us 2s
> worth of data we can leave behind when disabling aggregation. If it
> takes a worker more than two seconds to go idle after it finishes its
> last work item, we likely have bigger problems in the system, and
> won't notice one sample that was averaged with a bogus per-CPU weight.
> 
> --- a/kernel/sched/psi.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/psi.c
> @@ -480,9 +481,6 @@ static void psi_group_change(struct psi_group *group, int 
> cpu,
>                       groupc->tasks[t]++;
>  
>       write_seqcount_end(&groupc->seq);
> -
> -     if (!delayed_work_pending(&group->clock_work))
> -             schedule_delayed_work(&group->clock_work, PSI_FREQ);
>  }
>  
>  static struct psi_group *iterate_groups(struct task_struct *task, void 
> **iter)

This breaks Suren's "psi: introduce psi monitor":

--- kernel/sched/psi.c~psi-introduce-psi-monitor
+++ kernel/sched/psi.c
@@ -752,8 +1012,25 @@ static void psi_group_change(struct psi_
 
        write_seqcount_end(&groupc->seq);
 
-       if (!delayed_work_pending(&group->clock_work))
-               schedule_delayed_work(&group->clock_work, PSI_FREQ);
+       /*
+        * Polling flag resets to 0 at the max rate of once per update window
+        * (at least 500ms interval). smp_wmb is required after group->polling
+        * 0-to-1 transition to order groupc->times and group->polling writes
+        * because stall detection logic in the slowpath relies on groupc->times
+        * changing before group->polling. Explicit smp_wmb is missing because
+        * cmpxchg() implies smp_mb.
+        */
+       if ((state_mask & group->trigger_mask) &&
+               atomic_cmpxchg(&group->polling, 0, 1) == 0) {
+               /*
+                * Start polling immediately even if the work is already
+                * scheduled
+                */
+               mod_delayed_work(system_wq, &group->clock_work, 1);
+       } else {
+               if (!delayed_work_pending(&group->clock_work))
+                       schedule_delayed_work(&group->clock_work, PSI_FREQ);
+       }
 }
 
and I'm too lazy to go in and figure out how to fix it.

If we're sure about "psi: fix aggregation idle shut-off" (and I am not)
then can I ask for a redo of "psi: introduce psi monitor"?

Reply via email to