Christophe Leroy <christophe.le...@c-s.fr> writes: > Today's message is useless: > > [ 42.253267] Kernel stack overflow in process (ptrval), r1=c65500b0 > > This patch fixes it: > > [ 66.905235] Kernel stack overflow in process sh[356], r1=c65560b0 > > Fixes: ad67b74d2469 ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p") > Cc: <sta...@vger.kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.le...@c-s.fr> > --- > v2: make checkpatch happy :) > > arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c > index 5e917a84f949..a3dc6872d5aa 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c > @@ -1535,8 +1535,8 @@ void alignment_exception(struct pt_regs *regs) > > void StackOverflow(struct pt_regs *regs) > { > - printk(KERN_CRIT "Kernel stack overflow in process %p, r1=%lx\n", > - current, regs->gpr[1]); > + pr_crit("Kernel stack overflow in process %s[%d], r1=%lx\n", > + current->comm, current->pid, regs->gpr[1]);
I think you're meant to use task_pid_nr(current) these days. I fixed it up when applying. cheers