On Wed, 30 Jan 2019, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > > + "GPL and additional rights" Historical variant of expressing
> > > > that the
> > > > + module source is dual licensed under a
> > > > + GPL v2 variant and MIT license.
> > > > Please do
> > > > + not use in new code.
>
> Actually it was a historic fix for the fact that some slimeballs were
> going to use a proposed "BSD" tag and just ship binaries only whilst
> claiming that they were totally compliant with the BSD licence.
Ah, that is valuable information. I spent quite some time NOT to find it :)
Thanks,
tglx
