On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 15:11:40 +0100 (CET) Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2019, Jessica Yu wrote: > > +++ Thomas Gleixner [28/01/19 23:38 +0100]: > > > + "GPL" Module is licensed under GPL version > > > 2. This > > > + does not express any distinction between > > > + GPL-2.0-only or GPL-2.0-or-later. The exact > > > + license information can only be determined > > > + via the license information in the > > > + corresponding source files. > > > + > > > + "GPL v2" Same as "GPL v2". It exists for > > > historic > > > + reasons. > > > > Did you mean to say 'Same as "GPL"' here? (as in, "GPL v2" conveys the same > > information as the "GPL" module license string) > > Of course. After staring at all this for too long I confused myself and did > not spot it even if I read through the whole thing several times. Were you thinking of sending a new version with tweaks? I can happy apply this version with this fix if you prefer, let me know... Thanks, jon
