On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 03:03 +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > There's no problem to provide a high resolution sleep, but there is also > no reason to mess with msleep, don't fix what ain't broken...
John Corbet provided the patch because he had a problem with the current msleep... in that it didn't provide as good a common case as he wanted... so I think your statement is wrong ;) -- if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
