On 08-02-19, 11:35, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > At least some of the underlying mechanics seem to be very similar. > You have priority lists, addition and removal of requests etc. > > Arguably, PM QoS may be regarded as a bit overly complicated, but > maybe they both can use a common library underneath? > As I said I like the idea of replacing cpufreq notifiers with > something nicer, so if you can avoid doing almost-the-same-ting in two > different frameworks, it would be fine by me.
Ok, will try to move to PM QoS. Thanks. -- viresh
