Hi Lorenzo,

On 08/02/19 5:50 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 08:52:25PM +0800, Wen Yang wrote:
>> kmemdup has implemented the function that kmalloc() + memcpy().
>> We prefer to kmemdup rather than code opened implementation.
>>
>> This issue was detected with the help of coccinelle.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yan...@zte.com.cn>
>> CC: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kis...@ti.com>
>> CC: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieral...@arm.com>
>> CC: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelg...@google.com>
>> CC: Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimen...@synopsys.com>
>> CC: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cas...@axis.com>
>> CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
>> CC: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitc...@free-electrons.com>
>> CC: linux-...@vger.kernel.org (open list:PCI ENDPOINT SUBSYSTEM)
>> CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
>> ---
>>  drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 4 +---
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> Kishon,
> 
> this looks OK to me, anything I am missing ?

For the existing code this might seem the right thing to do but ideally the
memcpy here should be changed to memcpy_fromio/memcpy_toio.

Also later when we plan to use DMA (on the endpoint) for data transfer, we have
to use kzalloc and dma_map_single APIs.

So maybe the right thing would be to just fix it to use memcpy_fromio here.

Thanks
Kishon
> 
> Lorenzo
> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c 
>> b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
>> index 3e86fa3c7da3..8df6c019f8a2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
>> @@ -169,14 +169,12 @@ static int pci_epf_test_read(struct pci_epf_test 
>> *epf_test)
>>              goto err_addr;
>>      }
>>  
>> -    buf = kzalloc(reg->size, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +    buf = kmemdup(src_addr, reg->size, GFP_KERNEL);
>>      if (!buf) {
>>              ret = -ENOMEM;
>>              goto err_map_addr;
>>      }
>>  
>> -    memcpy(buf, src_addr, reg->size);
>> -
>>      crc32 = crc32_le(~0, buf, reg->size);
>>      if (crc32 != reg->checksum)
>>              ret = -EIO;
>> -- 
>> 2.19.1
>>

Reply via email to