On 11/02/19 6:30 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 11/02/2019 12:25, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>> + /* >> + * Nobody knows why anymore, but this interrupt has been handled as >> + * a level irq from the very beginning of davinci support in mainline >> + * linux. >> + */ >> + irq_set_handler(DAVINCI_INTC_IRQ(IRQ_TINT1_TINT34), handle_level_irq); >> + > > Now, the real question is: why isn't that set as part of the > set_irq_type() callback, instead of hardcoding it in the platform? > > This is exactly the kind of information that should come as part of the > DT or from the driver as one of the request_irq() flags. > > It would save quite a bit of boilerplate code. True, but I would keep this series feature/bug compatible with existing code. Without that, tracking regression reports will be a nightmare. Its a pretty major change already. We can (and should) fix this, but I prefer thats done as follow-up patch after this series is merged. That way a revert is easy. BTW, I don't quite see which in-kernel module uses this interrupt. It might be some out-of-tree code, or some code that since got removed from kernel. Thanks, Sekhar
