Hi Lorenzo,

Thanks for review, please see my comments below inline.

On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 11:42 PM Lorenzo Pieralisi
<lorenzo.pieral...@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 10:27:00AM +0530, Srinath Mannam wrote:
> > In the current implementation, config read output data 0xffff0001 is
> > assumed as CRS completion. But sometimes 0xffff0001 can be a valid data.
> >
> > IPROC PCIe host controller has a register to show config read request
> > status flags like SC, UR, CRS and CA. So that extra check is added to
> > confirm the CRS using status flags before reissue config read.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Srinath Mannam <srinath.man...@broadcom.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Ray Jui <ray....@broadcom.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc.c 
> > b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc.c
> > index c20fd6b..b882255 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc.c
> > @@ -60,6 +60,10 @@
> >  #define APB_ERR_EN_SHIFT             0
> >  #define APB_ERR_EN                   BIT(APB_ERR_EN_SHIFT)
> >
> > +#define CFG_RD_SUCCESS                       0
> > +#define CFG_RD_UR                    1
> > +#define CFG_RD_CRS                   2
> > +#define CFG_RD_CA                    3
> >  #define CFG_RETRY_STATUS             0xffff0001
> >  #define CFG_RETRY_STATUS_TIMEOUT_US  500000 /* 500 milliseconds */
> >
> > @@ -289,6 +293,9 @@ enum iproc_pcie_reg {
> >       IPROC_PCIE_IARR4,
> >       IPROC_PCIE_IMAP4,
> >
> > +     /* config read status */
> > +     IPROC_PCIE_CFG_RD_STATUS,
> > +
> >       /* link status */
> >       IPROC_PCIE_LINK_STATUS,
> >
> > @@ -350,6 +357,7 @@ static const u16 iproc_pcie_reg_paxb_v2[] = {
> >       [IPROC_PCIE_IMAP3]              = 0xe08,
> >       [IPROC_PCIE_IARR4]              = 0xe68,
> >       [IPROC_PCIE_IMAP4]              = 0xe70,
> > +     [IPROC_PCIE_CFG_RD_STATUS]      = 0xee0,
>
> So, with the *current* code, on controllers that does not support this
> register you won't be able to get any HW whose config space register
> value reads 0xffff0001 to work, is that correct ?
>
Yes, this feature(register) is available only in "iProc PCIe PAXB v2"
controller for other controllers it will not applicable.

Regards,
Srinath.
> Lorenzo
>
> >       [IPROC_PCIE_LINK_STATUS]        = 0xf0c,
> >       [IPROC_PCIE_APB_ERR_EN]         = 0xf40,
> >  };
> > @@ -474,10 +482,12 @@ static void __iomem *iproc_pcie_map_ep_cfg_reg(struct 
> > iproc_pcie *pcie,
> >       return (pcie->base + offset);
> >  }
> >
> > -static unsigned int iproc_pcie_cfg_retry(void __iomem *cfg_data_p)
> > +static unsigned int iproc_pcie_cfg_retry(struct iproc_pcie *pcie,
> > +                                      void __iomem *cfg_data_p)
> >  {
> >       int timeout = CFG_RETRY_STATUS_TIMEOUT_US;
> >       unsigned int data;
> > +     u32 status;
> >
> >       /*
> >        * As per PCIe spec r3.1, sec 2.3.2, CRS Software Visibility only
> > @@ -498,6 +508,15 @@ static unsigned int iproc_pcie_cfg_retry(void __iomem 
> > *cfg_data_p)
> >        */
> >       data = readl(cfg_data_p);
> >       while (data == CFG_RETRY_STATUS && timeout--) {
> > +             /*
> > +              * CRS state is set in CFG_RD status register
> > +              * This will handle the case where CFG_RETRY_STATUS is
> > +              * valid config data.
> > +              */
> > +             status = iproc_pcie_read_reg(pcie, IPROC_PCIE_CFG_RD_STATUS);
> > +             if (status != CFG_RD_CRS)
> > +                     return data;
> > +
> >               udelay(1);
> >               data = readl(cfg_data_p);
> >       }
> > @@ -576,7 +595,7 @@ static int iproc_pcie_config_read(struct pci_bus *bus, 
> > unsigned int devfn,
> >       if (!cfg_data_p)
> >               return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND;
> >
> > -     data = iproc_pcie_cfg_retry(cfg_data_p);
> > +     data = iproc_pcie_cfg_retry(pcie, cfg_data_p);
> >
> >       *val = data;
> >       if (size <= 2)
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >

Reply via email to