On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 23:23:57 +0100
Lukasz Luba <[email protected]> wrote:

> The patch adds a new file for with trace events for devfreq
> framework. They are used for performance analysis of the framework.
> It also contains updates in MAINTAINERS file adding new entry for
> devfreq maintainers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <[email protected]>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS                    |  1 +
>  include/trace/events/devfreq.h | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 include/trace/events/devfreq.h
> 
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 9919840..c042fda 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -4447,6 +4447,7 @@ S:      Maintained
>  F:   drivers/devfreq/
>  F:   include/linux/devfreq.h
>  F:   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/
> +F:   include/trace/events/devfreq.h
>  
>  DEVICE FREQUENCY EVENT (DEVFREQ-EVENT)
>  M:   Chanwoo Choi <[email protected]>
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/devfreq.h b/include/trace/events/devfreq.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..fec9304
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/trace/events/devfreq.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +#undef TRACE_SYSTEM
> +#define TRACE_SYSTEM devfreq
> +
> +#if !defined(_TRACE_DEVFREQ_H) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ)
> +#define _TRACE_DEVFREQ_H
> +
> +#include <linux/devfreq.h>
> +#include <linux/tracepoint.h>
> +
> +TRACE_EVENT(devfreq_monitor,
> +     TP_PROTO(const char *dev_name, unsigned long freq,
> +              unsigned int polling_ms, unsigned long busy_time,
> +              unsigned long total_time),
> +
> +     TP_ARGS(dev_name, freq, polling_ms, busy_time, total_time),
> +
> +     TP_STRUCT__entry(
> +             __string(dev_name, dev_name)

I would also put the string at the end. Strings are stored as a dynamic
array in the event, where the position of __string() holds a 32 bit
number. The 16 MSBs is the length of the string and the 16 LSBs is the
offset into the trace event (after the TP_STRUCT__entry).

That means on a 64 bit machine, there's a chance that this struct will
have a 4 byte "hole" between the __string() meta data and the freq
field.

-- Steve

> +             __field(unsigned long, freq)
> +             __field(unsigned int, polling_ms)
> +             __field(unsigned int, load)
> +     ),
> +
> +     TP_fast_assign(
> +             __assign_str(dev_name, dev_name);
> +             __entry->freq = freq;
> +             __entry->polling_ms = polling_ms;
> +             __entry->load = (100 * busy_time) / total_time;
> +     ),
> +
> +     TP_printk("dev_name=%s freq=%lu polling_ms=%u load=%u",
> +             __get_str(dev_name), __entry->freq, __entry->polling_ms,
> +             __entry->load)
> +);
> +#endif /* _TRACE_DEVFREQ_H */
> +
> +/* This part must be outside protection */
> +#include <trace/define_trace.h>

Reply via email to