Hi Lukasz,

On 19. 2. 13. 오전 7:23, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> This patch add basic tracing of the devfreq workqueue and delayed work.
> It aims to capture changes of the polling intervals and device state.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
> index 29e99ce..c1d0d8c 100644
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,9 @@
>  #include <linux/of.h>
>  #include "governor.h"
>  
> +#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> +#include <trace/events/devfreq.h>
> +
>  /* The ~30% load threshold used for load calculation (due to fixed point
>   * arithmetic) */
>  #define LOAD_THRESHOLD_IN_DEVICE_USAGE (300)
> @@ -418,6 +421,7 @@ static void devfreq_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
>       struct devfreq *devfreq = container_of(work,
>                                       struct devfreq, work.work);
>       unsigned int polling_ms;
> +     const char *df_name = dev_name(&devfreq->dev);

nit: You can use 'dev_name(&devfreq->dev)' directly
without defining the separate df_name.

>  
>       mutex_lock(&devfreq->lock);
>       polling_ms = devfreq_get_polling_delay(devfreq);
> @@ -429,6 +433,10 @@ static void devfreq_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
>       schedule_delayed_work(&devfreq->work,
>                             msecs_to_jiffies(polling_ms));
>       mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock);
> +
> +     trace_devfreq_monitor(df_name, devfreq->previous_freq, polling_ms,
> +                           devfreq->last_status.busy_time,
> +                           devfreq->last_status.total_time);

Regardless of type of work,
I think that trace point is necessary for devfreq framework.

Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <[email protected]>

>  }
>  
>  /**
> 

-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics

Reply via email to