On 2/8/19 3:13 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-02-08 at 14:54 -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
>> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>>
>> This patch fixes the following warnings:
>>
>> security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c:85:10: warning: this statement may 
>> fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:940:18: warning: this statement may fall 
>> through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:943:7: warning: this statement may fall 
>> through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:972:21: warning: this statement may fall 
>> through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:974:7: warning: this statement may fall 
>> through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> security/smack/smack_lsm.c:3391:9: warning: this statement may fall through 
>> [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> security/apparmor/domain.c:569:6: warning: this statement may fall through 
>> [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>>
>> Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
>>
>> Also, add a missing break statement to fix the following warning:
>>
>> security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c:116:26: warning: this statement may 
>> fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>>
>> Acked-by: John Johansen <john.johan...@canonical.com>
>> Acked-by: Casey Schaufler <ca...@schaufler-ca.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gust...@embeddedor.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Mimi Zohar <zo...@linux.ibm.com>
> 

Thanks, Mimi.

--
Gustavo

>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>>  - Update Subject.
>>  - Integrate a missing break in switch fix by Mimi Zohar.
>>
>>  security/apparmor/domain.c                | 2 +-
>>  security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c     | 1 +
>>  security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c       | 4 ++++
>>  security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c | 1 +
>>  security/smack/smack_lsm.c                | 3 +--
>>  5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/security/apparmor/domain.c b/security/apparmor/domain.c
>> index 3b266a438776..ca2dccf5b445 100644
>> --- a/security/apparmor/domain.c
>> +++ b/security/apparmor/domain.c
>> @@ -572,7 +572,7 @@ static struct aa_label *x_to_label(struct aa_profile 
>> *profile,
>>                      stack = NULL;
>>                      break;
>>              }
>> -            /* fall through to X_NAME */
>> +            /* fall through - to X_NAME */
>>      case AA_X_NAME:
>>              if (xindex & AA_X_CHILD)
>>                      /* released by caller */
>> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c 
>> b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
>> index a2baa85ea2f5..5fb7127bbe68 100644
>> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
>> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
>> @@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ static void ima_set_cache_status(struct 
>> integrity_iint_cache *iint,
>>              break;
>>      case CREDS_CHECK:
>>              iint->ima_creds_status = status;
>> +            break;
>>      case FILE_CHECK:
>>      case POST_SETATTR:
>>              iint->ima_file_status = status;
>> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c 
>> b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
>> index 26fa9d9723f6..e0cc323f948f 100644
>> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
>> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
>> @@ -936,10 +936,12 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct 
>> ima_rule_entry *entry)
>>              case Opt_uid_gt:
>>              case Opt_euid_gt:
>>                      entry->uid_op = &uid_gt;
>> +                    /* fall through */
>>              case Opt_uid_lt:
>>              case Opt_euid_lt:
>>                      if ((token == Opt_uid_lt) || (token == Opt_euid_lt))
>>                              entry->uid_op = &uid_lt;
>> +                    /* fall through */
>>              case Opt_uid_eq:
>>              case Opt_euid_eq:
>>                      uid_token = (token == Opt_uid_eq) ||
>> @@ -968,9 +970,11 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct 
>> ima_rule_entry *entry)
>>                      break;
>>              case Opt_fowner_gt:
>>                      entry->fowner_op = &uid_gt;
>> +                    /* fall through */
>>              case Opt_fowner_lt:
>>                      if (token == Opt_fowner_lt)
>>                              entry->fowner_op = &uid_lt;
>> +                    /* fall through */
>>              case Opt_fowner_eq:
>>                      ima_log_string_op(ab, "fowner", args[0].from,
>>                                        entry->fowner_op);
>> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c 
>> b/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c
>> index 43752002c222..513b457ae900 100644
>> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c
>> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c
>> @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ static void ima_show_template_data_ascii(struct seq_file 
>> *m,
>>              /* skip ':' and '\0' */
>>              buf_ptr += 2;
>>              buflen -= buf_ptr - field_data->data;
>> +            /* fall through */
>>      case DATA_FMT_DIGEST:
>>      case DATA_FMT_HEX:
>>              if (!buflen)
>> diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
>> index 587dc06eba33..5c1613519d5a 100644
>> --- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
>> +++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
>> @@ -3380,13 +3380,12 @@ static void smack_d_instantiate(struct dentry 
>> *opt_dentry, struct inode *inode)
>>               */
>>              final = &smack_known_star;
>>              /*
>> -             * Fall through.
>> -             *
>>               * If a smack value has been set we want to use it,
>>               * but since tmpfs isn't giving us the opportunity
>>               * to set mount options simulate setting the
>>               * superblock default.
>>               */
>> +            /* Fall through */
>>      default:
>>              /*
>>               * This isn't an understood special case.
> 

Reply via email to