On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 11:55:22PM +0100, Andrea Parri wrote:
> The comment should say "Sometimes" for the result.
I queued both of these, thank you! Just to be clear "Maybe" is "don't
care", so this patch is changing this litmus test from "LKMM can allow
or forbid, at its option" to "LKMM must allow". Which should be fine,
given that the test has absolutely no ordering.
Thanx, Paul
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <[email protected]>
> Cc: Alan Stern <[email protected]>
> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
> Cc: Boqun Feng <[email protected]>
> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]>
> Cc: David Howells <[email protected]>
> Cc: Jade Alglave <[email protected]>
> Cc: Luc Maranget <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
> Cc: Akira Yokosawa <[email protected]>
> Cc: Daniel Lustig <[email protected]>
> ---
> tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+poonceonces.litmus | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+poonceonces.litmus
> b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+poonceonces.litmus
> index b2b60b84fb9dc..172f0145301c5 100644
> --- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+poonceonces.litmus
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+poonceonces.litmus
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> C MP+poonceonces
>
> (*
> - * Result: Maybe
> + * Result: Sometimes
> *
> * Can the counter-intuitive message-passing outcome be prevented with
> * no ordering at all?
> --
> 2.7.4
>
