On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 11:06:48AM -0600, Andrew F. Davis wrote: > Did this work for you before? Strange it would if reversed, I wonder if > the SLEEP bit is really doing anything here. Can investigate later, for > this patch:
Thinking about it some more I'm wondering if it gets overridden by something else (ie, the CODEC actually being asleep requires this being set and some other thing being turned off).
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
