In non-smp configuration, hartid can be higher that NR_CPUS.
riscv_of_processor_hartid should not be compared to hartid to NR_CPUS in
that case. Moreover, this function checks all the DT properties of a
hart node. NR_CPUS comparison seems out of place.
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.pa...@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <a...@brainfault.org>
---
arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c
index d1d9bfd5..cf2fca12 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -34,10 +34,6 @@ int riscv_of_processor_hartid(struct device_node *node)
pr_warn("Found CPU without hart ID\n");
return -ENODEV;
}
- if (hart >= NR_CPUS) {
- pr_info("Found hart ID %d, which is above NR_CPUs. Disabling
this hart\n", hart);
- return -ENODEV;
- }
if (!of_device_is_available(node)) {
pr_info("CPU with hartid=%d is not available\n", hart);
--
2.7.4
