Hi, On 2019/3/4 14:55, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 4:35 AM Chen Yu <cheny...@huawei.com> wrote: >> On 2019/3/3 0:01, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>> On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 11:05 AM Yu Chen <cheny...@huawei.com> wrote: > >>>> +config HISI_HIKEY_USB >>>> + tristate "USB functionality of HiSilicon Hikey Platform" >>>> + depends on OF && GPIOLIB >>>> + help >>>> + If you say yes here you get support for usb functionality of >>>> HiSilicon Hikey Platform. >>> >>>> +#include <linux/of.h> >>> >>> It's hard to see why this have >>> depends on OF followed by above header inclusion. >>> >> This driver depends on devicetree, so I add "depends on OF". >> But is seems that "#include <linux/of.h>" can be removed after "of_" API >> have been removed. Thanks for your reminder! > > So, it means that technically there is no such dependency, rather > administratively. > OK. I will remove the dependent next version. >>>> + hisi_hikey_usb->typec_vbus = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "typec-vbus", >>>> + GPIOD_OUT_LOW); >>> >>>> + if (!hisi_hikey_usb->typec_vbus) >>>> + return -ENOENT; >>> >>> Hmm... Is it possible to get NULL pointer from gpiod_get() at all? >>> >>>> + if (!hisi_hikey_usb->otg_switch) >>>> + return -ENOENT; >>> >>> Ditto. >>> >> I check the comments of devm_gpio_get API, it will not return NULL pointer. >> But is it more safe to keep the NULL checking? What is your advice? > > Why do we need dead code? > OK.I will remove it.
Thanks Yu Chen
