On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 10:05:40AM +0000, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> +static inline unsigned int uclamp_none(int clamp_id)
> +{
> + if (clamp_id == UCLAMP_MIN)
> + return 0;
> + return SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void uclamp_rq_update(struct rq *rq, unsigned int clamp_id)
> +{
> + struct uclamp_bucket *bucket = rq->uclamp[clamp_id].bucket;
> + unsigned int max_value = uclamp_none(clamp_id);
That's 1024 for uclamp_max
> + unsigned int bucket_id;
> +
> + /*
> + * Both min and max clamps are MAX aggregated, thus the topmost
> + * bucket with some tasks defines the rq's clamp value.
> + */
> + bucket_id = UCLAMP_BUCKETS;
> + do {
> + --bucket_id;
> + if (!rq->uclamp[clamp_id].bucket[bucket_id].tasks)
> + continue;
> + max_value = bucket[bucket_id].value;
but this will then _lower_ it. That's not a MAX aggregate.
> + break;
> + } while (bucket_id);
> +
> + WRITE_ONCE(rq->uclamp[clamp_id].value, max_value);
> +}
