On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 03:23:59PM +0000, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> On 13-Mar 15:09, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 10:05:40AM +0000, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> > > +static inline void uclamp_rq_update(struct rq *rq, unsigned int clamp_id)
> > > +{
> > > + struct uclamp_bucket *bucket = rq->uclamp[clamp_id].bucket;
> > > + unsigned int max_value = uclamp_none(clamp_id);
> >
> > That's 1024 for uclamp_max
> >
> > > + unsigned int bucket_id;
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * Both min and max clamps are MAX aggregated, thus the topmost
> > > + * bucket with some tasks defines the rq's clamp value.
> > > + */
> > > + bucket_id = UCLAMP_BUCKETS;
> > > + do {
> > > + --bucket_id;
> > > + if (!rq->uclamp[clamp_id].bucket[bucket_id].tasks)
> > > + continue;
> > > + max_value = bucket[bucket_id].value;
> >
> > but this will then _lower_ it. That's not a MAX aggregate.
>
> For uclamp_max we want max_value=1024 when there are no active tasks,
> which means: no max clamp enforced on CFS/RT "idle" cpus.
>
> If instead there are active RT/CFS tasks then we want the clamp value
> of the max group, which means: MAX aggregate active clamps.
>
> That's what the code above does and the comment says.
That's (obviously) not how I read it... maybe something like:
static inline void uclamp_rq_update(struct rq *rq, unsigned int clamp_id)
{
struct uclamp_bucket *bucket = rq->uclamp[clamp_id].bucket;
int i;
/*
* Since both min and max clamps are max aggregated, find the
* top most bucket with tasks in.
*/
for (i = UCLMAP_BUCKETS-1; i>=0; i--) {
if (!bucket[i].tasks)
continue;
return bucket[i].value;
}
/* No tasks -- default clamp values */
return uclamp_none(clamp_id);
}
would make it clearer?
