On Wed, Mar 13 2019, Stefan Roese wrote: > On 13.03.19 17:46, Matthias Brugger wrote: >> >> >> On 13/03/2019 17:34, Chuanhong Guo wrote: >>> Hi! >>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 8:28 PM Matthias Brugger <matthias....@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 13/03/2019 13:24, Armando Miraglia wrote: >>>> [...] >>>> Apart from fixing styling issues it would be usefull to see if we can add >>>> support for mt7621 to drivers/spi/spi-mt65xx.c >>> It's impossible. They are completely different IPs. >> >> Thanks for the info. Do you know the status of the rest of the drivers in >> staging? > > Just to inform you. We are using this SPI driver from staging > in one of our customer projects and I will try to move this > driver out of staging into drivers/spi very shortly.
This is good news! I think the driver is ready to move out of staging and would be very happy to see you do it. My only small concern is that this driver was backported to openwrt (4.14 based) and then reverted https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/commit/749a29f76ca780d8df70a5163d43bbdc6f13ba3f "This breaks some mt7621 devices." Possibly it was backported badly, or possibly there is a problem. John: do you have any more details of the problem other than what is in the commit message? Thanks, NeilBrown
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
