On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 01:15:46PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 08:49:11AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > Still seems like a hack. Even though I don't know of a case that > > > > would break now. But it would be better to have the precise probing > > > > in the open retry loop, instead of trying to reinvent it here. > > > > > > how about something like below? > > > > Yes looks reasonable. > > full patch attached,
Acked-by: Andi Kleen <[email protected]> -Andi
