On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 07:02:06PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 10:49:56AM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote: > > Yes - Qiuxu did that already ... patch reposted below. > > ... to which Arnd said that it were fragile because it might break if it > includes a THIS_MODULE reference. So I'd say we won't do that then. And > keep it strictly a library. > > Right?
What is your definition of "library"? fsl_ddr_edac.c seems to have the same potential for breakage if someone makes a change to that, then it will hit the same problem. -Tony
