On 13-Mar 21:18, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 10:05:42AM +0000, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> > +static void uclamp_fork(struct task_struct *p)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int clamp_id;
> > +
> > + if (unlikely(!p->sched_class->uclamp_enabled))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + for (clamp_id = 0; clamp_id < UCLAMP_CNT; ++clamp_id)
> > + p->uclamp[clamp_id].active = false;
> > +}
>
> Because in that case .active == false, and copy_process() will have done
> thr right thing?
Don't really get what you mean here? :/
--
#include <best/regards.h>
Patrick Bellasi
