On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 01:44:35PM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > You have a point, enabling -Oz (aggressive optimization for size) > doesn't seem a good choice for the entire kernel.
Note that in this instance, -Os actually generates _smaller_ code than -Oz, now that's mostly because of stupid register shuffling, but still. > I'll send a patch to change it (back) to -Os. Thanks!
