It is unnecessary to call spin_lock_bh in a tasklet.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Xie <chongguig...@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/qplib_fp.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/qplib_fp.c 
b/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/qplib_fp.c
index 71c34d5..e2541c9 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/qplib_fp.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/qplib_fp.c
@@ -273,14 +273,14 @@ static void bnxt_qplib_service_nq(unsigned long data)
                                                     << 32;
                        cq = (struct bnxt_qplib_cq *)(unsigned long)q_handle;
                        bnxt_qplib_arm_cq_enable(cq);
-                       spin_lock_bh(&cq->compl_lock);
+                       spin_lock(&cq->compl_lock);
                        atomic_set(&cq->arm_state, 0);
                        if (!nq->cqn_handler(nq, (cq)))
                                num_cqne_processed++;
                        else
                                dev_warn(&nq->pdev->dev,
                                         "cqn - type 0x%x not handled\n", type);
-                       spin_unlock_bh(&cq->compl_lock);
+                       spin_unlock(&cq->compl_lock);
                        break;
                }
                case NQ_BASE_TYPE_SRQ_EVENT:
-- 
2.7.4

Reply via email to