[PATCH v2 4/4] drivers/base/memory.c: Rename the misleading parameter

[Baoquan He]

The input parameter 'phys_index' of memory_block_action() is actually
the section number, but not the phys_index of memory_block. Fix it.

Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <b...@redhat.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <raf...@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/base/memory.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/memory.c b/drivers/base/memory.c
index cb8347500ce2..184f4f8d1b62 100644
--- a/drivers/base/memory.c
+++ b/drivers/base/memory.c
@@ -231,13 +231,13 @@ static bool pages_correctly_probed(unsigned long 
start_pfn)
  * OK to have direct references to sparsemem variables in here.
  */
 static int
-memory_block_action(unsigned long phys_index, unsigned long action, int 
online_type)
+memory_block_action(unsigned long sec, unsigned long action, int online_type)
 {
        unsigned long start_pfn;
        unsigned long nr_pages = PAGES_PER_SECTION * sections_per_block;
        int ret;
 
-       start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(phys_index);
+       start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(sec);
 
        switch (action) {
        case MEM_ONLINE:
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ memory_block_action(unsigned long phys_index, unsigned long 
action, int online_t
                break;
        default:
                WARN(1, KERN_WARNING "%s(%ld, %ld) unknown action: "
-                    "%ld\n", __func__, phys_index, action, action);
+                    "%ld\n", __func__, sec, action, action);
                ret = -EINVAL;
        }
 
-- 
2.17.2