On Tue 26-03-19 17:02:27, Baoquan He wrote:
> The input parameter 'phys_index' of memory_block_action() is actually
> the section number, but not the phys_index of memory_block. Fix it.
phys_index is a relict from the past and it indeed denotes the section
number which is exported as phys_index via sysfs. start_section_nr would
be a better name IMHO but nothing to really bike shed about.
> Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <b...@redhat.com>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <raf...@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/memory.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/memory.c b/drivers/base/memory.c
> index cb8347500ce2..184f4f8d1b62 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/memory.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/memory.c
> @@ -231,13 +231,13 @@ static bool pages_correctly_probed(unsigned long
> start_pfn)
> * OK to have direct references to sparsemem variables in here.
> */
> static int
> -memory_block_action(unsigned long phys_index, unsigned long action, int
> online_type)
> +memory_block_action(unsigned long sec, unsigned long action, int online_type)
> {
> unsigned long start_pfn;
> unsigned long nr_pages = PAGES_PER_SECTION * sections_per_block;
> int ret;
>
> - start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(phys_index);
> + start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(sec);
>
> switch (action) {
> case MEM_ONLINE:
> @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ memory_block_action(unsigned long phys_index, unsigned
> long action, int online_t
> break;
> default:
> WARN(1, KERN_WARNING "%s(%ld, %ld) unknown action: "
> - "%ld\n", __func__, phys_index, action, action);
> + "%ld\n", __func__, sec, action, action);
> ret = -EINVAL;
> }
>
> --
> 2.17.2
>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
