On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 07:34:05PM +0800, Wen Yang wrote:
> The call to of_get_next_child returns a node pointer with refcount
> incremented thus it must be explicitly decremented after the last
> usage.
>
> Detected by coccinelle with the following warnings:
> ./arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c:102:1-7: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a
> node pointer with refcount incremented on line 69, but without a
> corresponding object release within this function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yan...@zte.com.cn>
> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
> Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> v2->v1: add a missing space between "adding" and "missing"
>
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c
> index ea00124..00f8b86 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c
> @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ static const char *__init cpu_read_enable_method(int cpu)
> pr_err("%pOF: missing enable-method property\n",
> dn);
> }
> + of_node_put(dn);
> } else {
> enable_method = acpi_get_enable_method(cpu);
> if (!enable_method) {
Looks about right to me:
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
How do you plan to get this upstream? Can we just pick this one up via
arm64?
Will
